Our Editorial Team

Our editorial principles

Casinos cannot pay to be ranked higher, to remove negative findings, or to delay an update that would change their score. Every review names the editor responsible and links back to the published scoring methodology, so a reader can trace a specific claim back to the step that produced it.

Reviews are backed by a real account, a real deposit, and a real withdrawal test — not copy-pasted from an affiliate kit. If a casino has not been through this process yet, we mark the entry as preliminary and withhold a score rather than publish a placeholder rating.

Conflict-of-interest policy

Editors do not hold undisclosed accounts at the operators they review and do not accept gifts, hospitality, or payment from any operator in exchange for coverage. Where a conflict exists, it is disclosed on the affected review and the editor recuses from that scoring decision. Report a suspected conflict via the editorial inbox.

Named-byline policy

We do not publish anonymous or AI-generated reviews. Individually authored reviews carry the writing editor's name. Collaborative pieces — comparisons, breaking-news updates, and statistical roundups produced without a single author — carry the "Editorial Team" byline instead of attributing shared work to one name. Every review states its publication date and, where updated, the date of the most recent revision.

Corrections

If you spot a factual error — an outdated bonus term, a wrong license number, a stale withdrawal time — write to the editorial inbox. We investigate, correct the page if the report holds up, and note the correction on the page. We do not silently edit a review after a reader flags an issue.

How the site is funded

Affiliate commissions are the only revenue source; there are no sponsored placements or paid rankings. Commission rates vary by operator and are documented on the affiliate disclosure page.

Standards we reference

License checks point to the relevant regulator's public registry — the Malta Gaming Authority, the Curaçao Gaming Authority, and others depending on the operator. RNG certification claims are checked against iTech Labs where an operator cites it. Responsible-gambling scoring is informed by the framework published by GambleAware. We do not claim our process is equivalent to a regulator audit — it is an editorial process that tries to surface what a player would actually experience.

Read more

See the about page for how the site is funded, the methodology for how every casino is tested, and the operators we do not recommend for the ones that failed our checks. Our terms of use and privacy policy apply to all reader interactions with the site.